“Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds dropped a bombshell on the Mike Malloy radio show, guest-hosted by Brad Friedman.”
“In the interview, Sibel says that the US maintained ‘intimate relations’ with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, ‘all the way until that day of September 11.'”
The rest of the gruesome, but not totally unexpected, story
Anyone brave enough to go after real “rule of law,” in the Obama administration yet? Or are you more interested in “looking forward” and being co-conspirators? (And if you are interested in that, why did you decide to wait %$#@ months so that the Reich could gather their army of professional liars together to defeat any real “change” in, oh let’s say, health care?)
Scribe – I am confused about the outburst against Obama at the end of the column. Could you clarify?
Barack could have pushed health care legislation forward and insist Democrats get this done before the Summer break. Instead he, and the legislators, seemed to be willing to let happen what many warned would happen: they took that time to promote lies and gather willing liars together. Now what the public was overwhelmingly for, has gone to 50/50. Scribe thinks it was an honest attempt on Barack’s part to show he was fair and willing to play nice: something they will never ever do. If we had an actual media willing to point this out rather than facilitate it that might have actually worked. And maybe Barack will perform yet another jujitsu move using their own corrupt nature against them.
YOS believes they are clueless as to just how mean, nasty, corrupt they are, and how much the media will let them get away with.
OK but what does that have to do with Sibel Edmond’s testimony about the Bush Admin and Osama/Al Queda/ Taliban? Sorry – perhaps I just have brain fog today.
The two are not directly connected, but it does go to an over-willingness to compromise and “go forward” rather than deal with what has happened and what will happen if you’re determined to be too nice, too compromising and too forgiving to those who will use that nature to cut your throat.
As Scribe typed, maybe there will be a moment where he uses this to flip it in his favor.
Maybe.
Scribe thinks it’s more an unintended, “Go ahead, cut my throat.” And it will go mostly unnoticed because the MSM will know not dwelling on it serves their corporate masters.