The week moved less like a cycle of political events than a study in how power behaves once it stops caring whether anyone believes it. A president responded to a double homicide not with restraint or silence, but with mockery, folding personal grievance into a moment that would once have demanded basic decency. Economic claims were asserted as fact through repetition rather than proof, while labor data quietly told a more complicated story beneath the talking points. History itself was edited in real time, engraved into the walls of the White House with partisan judgment presented as legacy. Accountability was promised again, deferred again, and framed as progress simply because something — anything — was released. What emerged was not a breakdown of norms, but a confidence that norms no longer require performance.

Across institutions the adjustment was subtle, but unmistakable. Republicans offered mild disapproval while carefully avoiding confrontation, treating presidential cruelty as an aesthetic problem rather than a governing one. Democrats, fresh off a handful of electoral wins, chose not to examine the reasons they lost nationally, shelving their own autopsy in favor of forward motion that avoids uncomfortable conclusions. The Justice Department, bound by a disclosure law signed by the president himself, quietly missed its deadline while insisting that delay was evidence of care. Each decision carried its own rationale, yet together they revealed a shared instinct: minimize friction, preserve momentum, and let time do the work that accountability once did.

Want to read more? Please click… HERE